The criminalization of politicians

Image: Feson Xie
Whatsapp
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Telegram
image_pdfimage_print

By MOWED VIANNA*

The 2013 Journeys opened the door for the shamed right

From redemocratization until 2013, the Brazilian right was practically isolated in two fields: one sheltered under patrimonialism and the other anchored in apparently folkloric and histrionic figures isolated within legislative life. And that changes radically in 2013.

Demonstrations that originally emerged in Rio de Janeiro against the 20-cent increase in bus fares soon turned into demonstrations against the government, evolved into demonstrations against “the politicians” and culminated in the inclusion of political parties in this agenda. In a short time, the right realized this wide avenue that opened up to it, where several characteristics of fascism were apparent and included in the demonstrations the fight for a Bill that would give more powers to the Public Prosecutors.

With this very lively and powerful picture, two other questions were born that were fundamental in the foundations of the current Bolsonarist right. The impeachment of President Dilma Rousseff and the beginning of Lava Jato, two milestones in the criminalization of politicians, especially left-wing politicians and more especially PT politicians.

The picture was more than ready for that right that ideologically hid itself for fear of being branded and stigmatized by the left and by libertarians as ignorant and backward, starting to take an unhealthy pride in the positions it defended and with the growth of Tupiniquim fascism, reborn green yellow in the demonstrations against Dilma Rousseff, like every fascist project needs idolatry, the figure of the “Myth” was created where the exponent of the extreme right consolidates itself as national leadership of the various shades of the right and invests heavily in the fanaticization of the masses.

Exploring two fears instilled in the subconscious of the Brazilian middle class, one coming from the Christian background, which is “the fear of communism” (although the masses barely know what communism is) and the one of personal and family security where supposedly the left would support the criminal activity, a thesis created by the right in Rio de Janeiro in the 1980s to combat Leonel Brizola, the right manages to revive the concept of a “savior of the homeland and family values”.

Returning to the 2013 conferences, another factor that contributed significantly to the paving of the field for the right to walk, whether consciously or not, was the work of groups of Black Blocks who would theoretically act “to defend the protesters from police brutality” and for anarchist actions such as the depredation of financial institution headquarters. These actions, which turned into generalized depredations and attacks even on journalists, such as the one who was fatally injured by an explosive, a “mortar”, and consolidated fear of the left in the general population.

Everything else, which occurred in the process of the arrival of the right, especially the extreme right, to power, was born, in our opinion, in the so-called days of July 2013, which were actually a kind of Marches with God for the Family and for Freedom, turbocharged and disguised in a version 2.0.

And today the conscious society must also learn from this so that there are no repetitions or revivals. It is up to the left to learn that it is not enough to win elections and come to power. That it is necessary to massively educate and inform the population about politics correctly, because this right that is “wounded”, but still very much alive, does not create scenarios where it reappears to “save Brazil”.

Segadas Vianna is a journalist.


the earth is round exists thanks to our readers and supporters.
Help us keep this idea going.
CONTRIBUTE

See all articles by

10 MOST READ IN THE LAST 7 DAYS

Dystopia as an instrument of containment
By GUSTAVO GABRIEL GARCIA: The cultural industry uses dystopian narratives to promote fear and critical paralysis, suggesting that it is better to maintain the status quo than to risk change. Thus, despite global oppression, a movement to challenge the capital-based model of life management has not yet emerged.
Aura and aesthetics of war in Walter Benjamin
By FERNÃO PESSOA RAMOS: Benjamin's "aesthetics of war" is not only a grim diagnosis of fascism, but a disturbing mirror of our own era, where the technical reproducibility of violence is normalized in digital flows. If the aura once emanated from the distance of the sacred, today it fades into the instantaneity of the war spectacle, where the contemplation of destruction is confused with consumption.
The next time you meet a poet
By URARIANO MOTA: The next time you meet a poet, remember: he is not a monument, but a fire. His flames do not light up halls — they burn out in the air, leaving only the smell of sulfur and honey. And when he is gone, you will miss even his ashes.
The Veils of Maya
By OTÁVIO A. FILHO: Between Plato and fake news, the truth hides beneath veils woven over centuries. Maya—a Hindu word that speaks of illusions—teaches us: illusion is part of the game, and distrust is the first step to seeing beyond the shadows we call reality.
The sociological reduction
By BRUNO GALVÃO: Commentary on the book by Alberto Guerreiro Ramos
The Machado de Assis Award 2025
By DANIEL AFONSO DA SILVA: Diplomat, professor, historian, interpreter and builder of Brazil, polymath, man of letters, writer. As it is not known who comes first. Rubens, Ricupero or Rubens Ricupero
Lecture on James Joyce
By JORGE LUIS BORGES: Irish genius in Western culture does not derive from Celtic racial purity, but from a paradoxical condition: dealing splendidly with a tradition to which they owe no special allegiance. Joyce embodies this literary revolution by transforming Leopold Bloom's ordinary day into an endless odyssey
Regis Bonvicino (1955-2025)
By TALES AB'SÁBER: Tribute to the recently deceased poet
Apathy syndrome
By JOÃO LANARI BO: Commentary on the film directed by Alexandros Avranas, currently showing in cinemas.
Economy of happiness versus economy of good living
By FERNANDO NOGUEIRA DA COSTA: In the face of the fetishism of global metrics, “buen vivir” proposes a pluriverse of knowledge. If Western happiness fits into spreadsheets, life in its fullness requires epistemic rupture — and nature as a subject, not as a resource
Technofeudalism
By EMILIO CAFASSI: Considerations on the newly translated book by Yanis Varoufakis
See all articles by

SEARCH

Search

TOPICS

NEW PUBLICATIONS