The economics of design

Image: Elyeser Szturm
Whatsapp
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Telegram
image_pdfimage_print

By Elias Jabbour*

The big question is whether financialization will continue to run smoothly or not. Here is the “x” of the question.

The trend now is to talk about “turning off the lights of neoliberalism”. Just to remind you that this vulgate like Paulo Guedes, Mansueto de Almeida , Marcos Lisboa, Samuel Pessoa and other rubbish was never applied by any economy that had a country like the United States, Germany, Japan, finally G-7. Silicon Valley is closer to Rudolf Hilferding than it is to Milton Friedman or Friedrich Hayek. Government purchases boost billionaire cutting-edge scientific research in many of these countries. Development banks existed in Germany before Ludwig von Mises' father was born.

No technocrat in the aforementioned countries believes in “free market”, “business environment”. I suspect they don't even believe much in microeconomics. They are nothing but nonsense that are taught to young people in the process of dehumanization in economics courses on the periphery of the system. The big question is whether financialization will continue to run smoothly or not. Here is the “x” of the question.

For her to ebb, new social pacts should be built. Wall Street it needs to review its “democratically” won seats in the US House of Representatives and the European Union to completely relax its fiscal rules. Will German banks “promoters of democracy and freedom of expression” in countries like Greece be willing to lose?

recent editorial by Financial Times admits that the State will have to take back (look at innocent economics students: take back) its place at the helm of the economy. Can you believe? That is, financialization will move backwards, banks will put their hands in handcuffs and perpetual peace will emerge after the pandemic. Personally I don't believe that.

Even the weight of what I call the reconstruction, in the capitalist world, of the former Projection Economies will demand a lot of struggle, raising social awareness on the part of millions of workers and the so-called “precariat”. Design economy is synonymous with an economy focused on the achievement of large projects and which has demand as its driving force. For this to happen under capitalism (it already happens in China, under the banner of a “New Design Economy”), the “guys” will have to hand over their rings and fingers.

Meanwhile, left-wing intellectuals (I won't mention names so as not to touch on sensibilities. I advance that they are foreigners and that articles are circulating about the so-called “Wuhan soup”. In Brazil there is a philosopher who is prodigal) feed their fan networks with their “ macumbarias” bringing audiences to tears. They are odes against the consumer society and the possibility of reinventing communism to egalitarian agrarian communities. They remain trapped in Eurocentric and poor notions about China, starting with the false cognate (the “euphemism of euphemisms”) of “state capitalism”.

None of them can see virtues in that experience. Turns and moves comes a recognition. Everyone stamps that 2200-year experience of the national state as a “dictatorship”, or even the next imperialism. None of them treats the question with the rigidity of Germanic historicism or the early humanism of the philosophies that were born in the Yangtze and Yellow river valley. Deep down, they are nothing more than intellectuals from the colonial countryside, as cruel as the Japanese were once in Nanjing.

On the right (financialisation) a major impasse fueling the systemic chaos from Barack Obama to Donald Trump. On the left, the mental block on what the new project economy (higher-level variation of socialism) can teach the world, which proved its superiority by ending a quarantine in 72 days, will prevent the left from envisioning an alternative to the impasse that will come after the pandemic. It will continue to be hostage to utopias and intellectual charlatans like those that make up the minds of our youth.

The truth that comes from China will take a long time to impose itself on the old man. Lifting 840 million people out of poverty in four decades is nothing.

We will live another stage of systemic chaos.

*Elias Jabbour He holds a PhD in Geography from USP and is an Adjunct Professor at the Faculty of Economic Sciences at FCE-UERJ.

Article originally published in trigger portal

See all articles by

10 MOST READ IN THE LAST 7 DAYS

The Veils of Maya
By OTÁVIO A. FILHO: Between Plato and fake news, the truth hides beneath veils woven over centuries. Maya—a Hindu word that speaks of illusions—teaches us: illusion is part of the game, and distrust is the first step to seeing beyond the shadows we call reality.
Regis Bonvicino (1955-2025)
By TALES AB'SÁBER: Tribute to the recently deceased poet
Dystopia as an instrument of containment
By GUSTAVO GABRIEL GARCIA: The cultural industry uses dystopian narratives to promote fear and critical paralysis, suggesting that it is better to maintain the status quo than to risk change. Thus, despite global oppression, a movement to challenge the capital-based model of life management has not yet emerged.
The financial fragility of the US
By THOMAS PIKETTY: Just as the gold standard and colonialism collapsed under the weight of their own contradictions, dollar exceptionalism will also come to an end. The question is not if, but how: through a coordinated transition or a crisis that will leave even deeper scars on the global economy?
The next time you meet a poet
By URARIANO MOTA: The next time you meet a poet, remember: he is not a monument, but a fire. His flames do not light up halls — they burn out in the air, leaving only the smell of sulfur and honey. And when he is gone, you will miss even his ashes.
Apathy syndrome
By JOÃO LANARI BO: Commentary on the film directed by Alexandros Avranas, currently showing in cinemas.
Claude Monet's studio
By AFRÂNIO CATANI: Commentary on the book by Jean-Philippe Toussaint
Aura and aesthetics of war in Walter Benjamin
By FERNÃO PESSOA RAMOS: Benjamin's "aesthetics of war" is not only a grim diagnosis of fascism, but a disturbing mirror of our own era, where the technical reproducibility of violence is normalized in digital flows. If the aura once emanated from the distance of the sacred, today it fades into the instantaneity of the war spectacle, where the contemplation of destruction is confused with consumption.
Donald Trump attacks Brazil
By VALERIO ARCARY: Brazil's response to Trump's offensive must be firm and public, raising public awareness of the growing dangers on the international stage.
See all articles by

SEARCH

Search

TOPICS

NEW PUBLICATIONS