Celebrities – yesterday and today

Image: David Buchi
Whatsapp
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Telegram
image_pdfimage_print

By FRANCISCO FERNANDES LADEIRA*

Our existence is much more complex and distressing than the chimerical happiness of yesterday's and today's celebrities demonstrates.

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the Brazilian media began to give great prominence to the so-called “celebrities”, a nomenclature by which a person considered “famous” is designated, that is, known to the general public, a constant presence in programs television programs, gossip columns and covers of specialized magazines.

At the time, several publications appeared exclusively intended to accompany the daily lives of celebrities, such as the famous magazine caras (every self-respecting celebrity should spend at least one weekend on Isla de Caras). Not by chance, between 2003 and 2004, the Globo aired a telenovela entitled precisely Celebridade.

In past decades, when cell phones still did not take pictures and “Selfie” was just a word in English class, it wasn't easy to turn into a celebrity. Either the individual had some artistic, musical or sporting talent, duly recognized, or lived in the shadow of someone: “so-and-so's girlfriend”, “cicrano's son” or “beltrano's friend”. There was only one possible way to become a celebrity: appearing exhaustively in the mainstream media, preferably on television programs with high ratings.

However, this reality has changed with the advent of social media. A profile on Facebook or Instagram is all it takes for anyone to feel like a celebrity, that is, to have the feeling of being watched by others, “following” their daily lives, posting what they are eating, disclosing where they are going, sharing their opinions about a certain subject and, of course, raise some controversies. Anonymity no more!

if before, paparazzi stalked celebrities for the best (and often embarrassing) flashes; these days, social media users are their own paparazzi. In this way, the virtual space turned into a great competition for “likes”.

However, as Sören Kierkegaard has warned, comparison is the root of human unhappiness. That joy in sharing certain events considered important on social networks soon turns into frustration when realizing that the other has a newer car, a bigger house, traveled to the most popular beach or has a more valued job.

That photo strategically posted to try to make the ex-boyfriend jealous soon loses its meaning when he learns that he is with a more beautiful and interesting partner. These are the side effects of social networks: sometimes we become aware of something that we didn't (at first) want to know, but that ends up affecting us. “What Facebook or Instagram sees, the heart feels”, says a classic popular saying, adapted for contemporary times.

In short, “real life” is not a fairy tale. Roberto Carlos already said: anyone who expects that life is made of illusion can go crazy. Our existence is much more complex and distressing than the chimerical happiness of yesterday's and today's celebrities demonstrates.

*Francisco Fernandes Ladeira is a doctoral student in geography at the State University of Campinas (Unicamp). Author, among other books, of The ideology of international news (ed. CRV).


the earth is round exists thanks to our readers and supporters.
Help us keep this idea going.
CONTRIBUTE

See all articles by

10 MOST READ IN THE LAST 7 DAYS

Regis Bonvicino (1955-2025)
By TALES AB'SÁBER: Tribute to the recently deceased poet
The Veils of Maya
By OTÁVIO A. FILHO: Between Plato and fake news, the truth hides beneath veils woven over centuries. Maya—a Hindu word that speaks of illusions—teaches us: illusion is part of the game, and distrust is the first step to seeing beyond the shadows we call reality.
Dystopia as an instrument of containment
By GUSTAVO GABRIEL GARCIA: The cultural industry uses dystopian narratives to promote fear and critical paralysis, suggesting that it is better to maintain the status quo than to risk change. Thus, despite global oppression, a movement to challenge the capital-based model of life management has not yet emerged.
Aura and aesthetics of war in Walter Benjamin
By FERNÃO PESSOA RAMOS: Benjamin's "aesthetics of war" is not only a grim diagnosis of fascism, but a disturbing mirror of our own era, where the technical reproducibility of violence is normalized in digital flows. If the aura once emanated from the distance of the sacred, today it fades into the instantaneity of the war spectacle, where the contemplation of destruction is confused with consumption.
The next time you meet a poet
By URARIANO MOTA: The next time you meet a poet, remember: he is not a monument, but a fire. His flames do not light up halls — they burn out in the air, leaving only the smell of sulfur and honey. And when he is gone, you will miss even his ashes.
Apathy syndrome
By JOÃO LANARI BO: Commentary on the film directed by Alexandros Avranas, currently showing in cinemas.
The financial fragility of the US
By THOMAS PIKETTY: Just as the gold standard and colonialism collapsed under the weight of their own contradictions, dollar exceptionalism will also come to an end. The question is not if, but how: through a coordinated transition or a crisis that will leave even deeper scars on the global economy?
Catching up or falling behind?
By ELEUTÉRIO FS PRADO: Unequal development is not an accident, but a structure: while capitalism promises convergence, its logic reproduces hierarchies. Latin America, between false miracles and neoliberal traps, continues to export value and import dependence
The 2025 BRICS summit
By JONNAS VASCONCELOS: Brazil's BRICS presidency: priorities, limitations and results in a turbulent global scenario
See all articles by

SEARCH

Search

TOPICS

NEW PUBLICATIONS