Relative dictatorship and denialism: Brazil, 1964 (2016, 2018…)

Hans Hofmann, Laburnum, 1954
Whatsapp
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Telegram
image_pdfimage_print

By GILBERTO MARINGONI*

Commentary on the recently published book by Marcos Silva

Interpretations about the Brazilian military dictatorship remain open. It is not just a question of judging the responsibilities of operators and commissioners of crimes committed by the regime that ended in 1985 – a task not faced by any government since then –, but of verifying that the cycle started by the 2016 coup represents the repetition of History as a chanchada . The so-called “myth”, elected two years later, strives to create a heroic mythology of the 21 years of lead through the shattering of collective memory.

Reinterpreting and redefining what those times were means touching intertwined layers of historical time. Despite respectable works, the almost four decades that separate us from the last general to usurp the head of the Executive were also fertile in the creation of biased narratives, which jump from the “dictabranda” to the hagiography of characters in search of washing their own biography with dyes civilized.

Faced with such actors, Marcos Silva is relentless in this Relative dictatorship and denialism: Brazil, 1964 (2016, 2018…). His intellectual club begins with the title, a clear paraphrase of the unforgettable concept of relative dictatorship that General Ernesto Geisel offered us, weeks after Congress closed, in April 1977.

Relative, for Marcos, is a good part of the historiography about the uniformed regime, considered as canonical by the media and the academy.

Based on a solid intellectual and cultural background, the historian examines the works of Elio Gaspari and Marcos Napolitano and points out that, although guided by interpretative distance, making history cannot be ambiguous in extreme situations. Trampling democracy, tearing up the Constitution and staining political life with blood are gestures in which all pretense is an accomplice.

Marcos Silva honors the craft of historian in a book written with meter and passion.

*Gilberto Maringoni is a professor at the Federal University of ABC.

Reference


Mark Silva. Relative dictatorship and denialism: Brazil, 1964 (2016, 2018…). São Paulo, Maria Antonia Editions, 2021.

 

See all articles by

10 MOST READ IN THE LAST 7 DAYS

The sociological reduction
By BRUNO GALVÃO: Commentary on the book by Alberto Guerreiro Ramos
The origins of the Portuguese language
By HENRIQUE SANTOS BRAGA & MARCELO MÓDOLO: In times of such rigid borders and such disputed identities, remembering that Portuguese was born in the back and forth between margins – geographical, historical and linguistic – is, at the very least, a beautiful exercise in intellectual humility.
The Machado de Assis Award 2025
By DANIEL AFONSO DA SILVA: Diplomat, professor, historian, interpreter and builder of Brazil, polymath, man of letters, writer. As it is not known who comes first. Rubens, Ricupero or Rubens Ricupero
Technofeudalism
By EMILIO CAFASSI: Considerations on the newly translated book by Yanis Varoufakis
Aura and aesthetics of war in Walter Benjamin
By FERNÃO PESSOA RAMOS: Benjamin's "aesthetics of war" is not only a grim diagnosis of fascism, but a disturbing mirror of our own era, where the technical reproducibility of violence is normalized in digital flows. If the aura once emanated from the distance of the sacred, today it fades into the instantaneity of the war spectacle, where the contemplation of destruction is confused with consumption.
Economy of happiness versus economy of good living
By FERNANDO NOGUEIRA DA COSTA: In the face of the fetishism of global metrics, “buen vivir” proposes a pluriverse of knowledge. If Western happiness fits into spreadsheets, life in its fullness requires epistemic rupture — and nature as a subject, not as a resource
Lecture on James Joyce
By JORGE LUIS BORGES: Irish genius in Western culture does not derive from Celtic racial purity, but from a paradoxical condition: dealing splendidly with a tradition to which they owe no special allegiance. Joyce embodies this literary revolution by transforming Leopold Bloom's ordinary day into an endless odyssey
The United States' turn to China
By TADEU VALADARES: The hegemonic transition between the United States and China is not a mere geopolitical situation, but the most recent chapter of an 800-year-old historical capitalism that has reached its two-pronged stage: productive versus financial-warlike
The Lula government and its sphinx
By LISZT VIEIRA: Lula's sphinx does not ask riddles, but demands answers: either the government breaks with the conciliation policy that weakens it, or it will be devoured by history. The time of the "good guy" is over – only a clear and courageous project will save his legacy from the ballot boxes hungry for change
Is there no alternative?
By PEDRO PAULO ZAHLUTH BASTOS: Austerity, politics and ideology of the new fiscal framework
See all articles by

SEARCH

Search

TOPICS

NEW PUBLICATIONS