two good news



The deafening silence of the Brazilian press in the face of the persecution of Julian Assange is impressive

Last week did not just bring a note worthy of the president of the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa), Vice Admiral Antônio Barra Torres, challenging President Jair Bolsonaro to prove the accusations he has been making to the agency.

There was another piece of good news, in fact, two, amid a lot of bad events: last Monday, January 3rd, the Justice of the United Kingdom decided not to extradite Julian Assange to the United States. Immediately, the government of Mexico went public to offer political asylum to the Australian journalist who created Wikileaks, which was announced at a press conference by President Lopez Obrador.

Assange has been out of circulation for ten years. First, a refugee at the Ecuadorian embassy in London since 2012. Then, from 2019 until now, incarcerated in a British prison. This is all due to pressure from the US government. If he were extradited to the United States, the journalist could be sentenced to sentences that, added, would reach 175 years in prison – that is, he would be in prison for life.

It sounds absurd. And is.

The decision announced by the Mexican president is in line with his country's ancient tradition of granting asylum to politically persecuted people. Already after the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), which produced more than 200 political refugees, due to the persecutions that the Franco-fascists promoted on a large scale against supporters of the Republic, Mexico was one of the main destinations of those affected. Leon Trotsky himself, one of the leaders of the Russian Revolution of 1917, was in asylum in that country when, in 1940, he was assassinated by an agent of Joseph Stalin's political police.

Later, during the Estado Novo dictatorship in Brazil (1937-1945), when the mother of Luís Carlos Prestes, Leocádia, who was exiled in Mexico, died, President Lázaro Cardenas showed solidarity with the communist leader. He asked the Brazilian courts to authorize Prestes, who was imprisoned at the time, to travel to that country for his mother's funeral. Cárdenas even offered to come to Brazil and remain in prison during the period when Prestes was burying his mother, as a guarantee that he would not take advantage of the trip to escape. This act was of the greatest significance, even more so coming from a President of the Republic.

Now, the offer of asylum to Assange is nothing more than the reaffirmation of an old and beautiful tradition of Mexico.

But, after all, what terrible crime would the Australian journalist have committed to be the target of such hatred?

Well, he simply made public, on the internet, criminal actions of the US government, including starting wars without congressional authorization and murdering civilians in large numbers. Is the disclosure of this, by any chance, a crime?

But the Assange episode gives us the opportunity to reflect on two other very important points. The first is the imperial behavior of the United States. If the release outside the United States of documents proving crimes bothered Washington, that's not a problem with the press. Assange's role, as a journalist, was to disseminate that information, which was of public interest and was duly confirmed.

The fact that some bureaucrat stamped “top secret” on a document does not oblige anyone who is not an employee of the US government to keep it confidential. Assange did what any journalist committed to the truth of the facts, democracy, human rights and the ethics of his profession would do: he disseminated the documents. In fact, any citizen committed to these values ​​of universal importance, regardless of their profession, should take the same attitude.

The second point to be remembered is the deafening silence of the Brazilian press regarding the episode. The persecution of Assange has worldwide repercussions and is an attempt to restrict the democratization of information – an essential banner in any civilized society.

But in our country not a single word on the subject was seen in the mainstream press.

It is a pity that the Brazilian media has tried to hide it. This takes away your authority when dealing with any other issue related to freedom of expression, an issue that is so relevant in a democracy.

Even so, there are reasons to celebrate: democracy and human rights gain a lot from Assange's release, which seems to be close.

Viva Assange, a professional of good information and democracy.

* Chico Alencar is a professor of history, writer and councilor at the City Council of Rio de Janeiro.


See this link for all articles


  • About artificial ignoranceEugenio Bucci 15/06/2024 By EUGÊNIO BUCCI: Today, ignorance is not an uninhabited house, devoid of ideas, but a building full of disjointed nonsense, a goo of heavy density that occupies every space
  • Franz Kafka, libertarian spiritFranz Kafka, libertarian spirit 13/06/2024 By MICHAEL LÖWY: Notes on the occasion of the centenary of the death of the Czech writer
  • Introduction to “Capital” by Karl Marxred triangular culture 02/06/2024 By ELEUTÉRIO FS PRADO: Commentary on the book by Michael Heinrich
  • The society of dead historyclassroom similar to the one in usp history 16/06/2024 By ANTONIO SIMPLICIO DE ALMEIDA NETO: The subject of history was inserted into a generic area called Applied Human and Social Sciences and, finally, disappeared into the curricular drain
  • Impasses and solutions for the political momentjose dirceu 12/06/2024 By JOSÉ DIRCEU: The development program must be the basis of a political commitment from the democratic front
  • Strengthen PROIFESclassroom 54mf 15/06/2024 By GIL VICENTE REIS DE FIGUEIREDO: The attempt to cancel PROIFES and, at the same time, turn a blind eye to the errors of ANDES management is a disservice to the construction of a new representation scenario
  • The strike at federal Universities and Institutescorridor glazing 01/06/2024 By ROBERTO LEHER: The government disconnects from its effective social base by removing those who fought against Jair Bolsonaro from the political table
  • A myopic logicRED MAN WALKING _ 12/06/2024 By LUIS FELIPE MIGUEL: The government does not have the political will to make education a priority, while it courts the military or highway police, who do not move a millimeter away from the Bolsonarism that they continue to support
  • Hélio Pellegrino, 100 years oldHelio Pellegrino 14/06/2024 By FERNANDA CANAVÊZ & FERNANDA PACHECO-FERREIRA: In the vast elaboration of the psychoanalyst and writer, there is still an aspect little explored: the class struggle in psychoanalysis
  • Volodymyr Zelensky's trapstar wars 15/06/2024 By HUGO DIONÍSIO: Whether Zelensky gets his glass full – the US entry into the war – or his glass half full – Europe’s entry into the war – either solution is devastating for our lives