Is it possible to guarantee the sustainability of the Earth?

Image: Alena Koval
Whatsapp
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Telegram

By LEONARDO BOFF*

It is still possible to avoid a planetary tragedy by giving importance to values ​​such as care, love, solidarity, compassion, creation and spirituality to guarantee the sustainability of the Common Home.

1.

If we look at the frequency of disruptions occurring on Earth, especially with increasing global warming, coupled with the fact that deniers are as powerful as US President Donald Trump, it is worth seriously asking whether the planet is still sustainable or is heading towards a phenomenal tragedy.

Let us take as a warning the data published by Institute and Faculty of Actuaries at Exeter University (United Kingdom), known for its seriousness: it states: “with temperatures 3°C above pre-industrial levels – human mortality could reach half of humanity, around four billion people” not in the distant future, but in a few decades.

We need a broader concept of sustainability than the famous one from the Brundland Report (1987) that focuses only on human beings and omits nature. I propose a more inclusive one: “Sustainable development is any action aimed at maintaining the energetic, informational, physical-chemical conditions that sustain all beings, especially the living Earth, nature and human life, aiming at their continuity and also meeting the needs of the present and future generations in such a way that natural capital is maintained and enriched in its capacity for regeneration, reproduction and co-evolution”.

What can be done to ensure this type of sustainability? I am convinced that the narratives of the past no longer point us to a hopeful future. This does not mean that we will give up trying to improve the situation. The principle of hope that burns within us can project minimalist utopias that make life easier and preserve nature. To do this, we must start from below, from the territory, where sustainability can be built within the framework of the ecological conditions outlined by nature, with its forests, its rivers, its population and its religious traditions.

It is up to us whether we want to change or continue on the same path. There comes a time when we have no other alternative but to believe, trust and hope in ourselves. We have to drink from our own well. It contains the principles and values ​​that, if activated, can save us. Here are some of the main ones.

2.

First, “care”. We know from ancient reflection (Hyginus’ myth of care) and from modern reflection (Martin Heidegger) that the essence of the human being resides in care, a condition for living and surviving. If all the elements of evolution did not have a subtle care for each other, the human being would not emerge. Since it does not have any specialized organs, it needs care to live and survive. In the same way, if nature is not cared for, it withers away.

Then, as biologists (Watson/Krick) have shown, “love” belongs to human DNA. To love means to establish a relationship of communion, of reciprocity, with all things and implies creating an emotional bond with them.

The value of “solidarity” is fundamental. Bioanthropology has shown that the search for food, consumed communally, allowed the leap from animality to humanity. What was true in the past is even more true in the dark days of today.

We are also beings of “compassion”: we can put ourselves in someone else’s shoes, cry with them, share their anguish and never leave them alone. It is one of the virtues most lacking today.

We are still “creative beings”: we are continually inventing things to solve our problems. Today, more than ever, innovation is urgent if we do not want to fall behind in safeguarding life and nature.

Since our earliest ancestors, when the limbic brain emerged 200 million years ago, we have been beings of heart, affection and sensitivity. In the sensitive heart resides tenderness, spirituality and ethics. Today more than ever we must unite mind and heart, rationality and sensitivity, because the entire scientific edifice was built on placing affection under suspicion. Today it is out of humanitarian sensitivity that we condemn the perverse genocide, carried out in the open air, in the Gaza Strip of more than 13 thousand innocent children and more than 60 thousand civilians.

We are, in the deepest part of our humanity, spiritual beings. Spirituality belongs to human nature, with the same right of citizenship as intelligence, will and libido. It must be distinguished from religiosity, although they can come together and enhance each other. But not necessarily. Natural spirituality, however, is more original. Religiosity presupposes and feeds on spirituality.

Spirituality lives on unconditional love, solidarity, compassion, and care for the most vulnerable and for nature. Furthermore, as spiritual beings we are able to identify that vigorous and loving Energy that sustains all things and the entire universe, to which we can reverently open ourselves. Either we integrate natural spirituality, living as brothers and sisters together with nature, or we condemn ourselves to repeat the past with all the risks that today threaten our existence.

An eco-civilization founded on such values ​​and principles can guarantee the sustainability of our Common Home. Within it are the various cultural worlds that can and should coexist peacefully. A utopia? Yes, but a necessary utopia if we still want to have a sustainable future together with Mother Earth.

*Leonardo Boff is an ecologist, philosopher and writer. Author, among other books, of The painful birth of Mother Earth: a society of fraternity and social friendship (Vozes).


the earth is round there is thanks to our readers and supporters.
Help us keep this idea going.
CONTRIBUTE

See all articles by

10 MOST READ IN THE LAST 7 DAYS

Umberto Eco – the world’s library
By CARLOS EDUARDO ARAÚJO: Considerations on the film directed by Davide Ferrario.
Machado de Assis' chronicle about Tiradentes
By FILIPE DE FREITAS GONÇALVES: A Machado-style analysis of the elevation of names and republican significance
The Arcadia complex of Brazilian literature
By LUIS EUSTÁQUIO SOARES: Author's introduction to the recently published book
Dialectics and value in Marx and the classics of Marxism
By JADIR ANTUNES: Presentation of the recently released book by Zaira Vieira
Culture and philosophy of praxis
By EDUARDO GRANJA COUTINHO: Foreword by the organizer of the recently released collection
The neoliberal consensus
By GILBERTO MARINGONI: There is minimal chance that the Lula government will take on clearly left-wing banners in the remainder of his term, after almost 30 months of neoliberal economic options
The editorial of Estadão
By CARLOS EDUARDO MARTINS: The main reason for the ideological quagmire in which we live is not the presence of a Brazilian right wing that is reactive to change nor the rise of fascism, but the decision of the PT social democracy to accommodate itself to the power structures
Gilmar Mendes and the “pejotização”
By JORGE LUIZ SOUTO MAIOR: Will the STF effectively determine the end of Labor Law and, consequently, of Labor Justice?
Brazil – last bastion of the old order?
By CICERO ARAUJO: Neoliberalism is becoming obsolete, but it still parasitizes (and paralyzes) the democratic field
The meanings of work – 25 years
By RICARDO ANTUNES: Introduction by the author to the new edition of the book, recently released
See all articles by

SEARCH

Search

TOPICS

NEW PUBLICATIONS