War, terror and selective outrage

Image: Gaza Strip / Reproduction Telegram
Whatsapp
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Telegram

By SALEM NASSER*

If the newspaper Folha de São Paulo follow your own Manual, would classify Israel as a terrorist, but it only does so to name Hamas in that way

Imagine. Imagine that 2,5 million Jews have lived in an open-air prison for 17 years and that their jailer decides what goes in and what goes out, energy, food, medicine... Imagine that Jewish families are daily expelled from their homes, their homes and of their ancestors, of their land for generations, to provide housing for non-Jews from all over the world. Imagine that Jews live surrounded by walls and fences and cannot walk on the same streets that are free only for non-Jews.

Imagine that the Jews have their national identity, their very existence as a people, denied. Imagine that someone, a minister, for example, says that Jews are animals to be eliminated. Imagine that the jailer announces, and then follows through, that he will cut off the Jews' access to water, electricity and food. And imagine that those 2,5 million Jews, in their prison, are targeted, for days in a row, by the most intelligent and deadly weapons in the world, and by white phosphorus bombs and that, for example, only on the first night of bombings, 140 children die….

Now, imagine that Jews are Palestinians. Have you finally woken up now? If you haven't woken up, I'll give you a tip: you need to imagine that the Palestinian is a human being like the Jew; and you have to imagine that, like Jews and all other human beings, Palestinians can be civilians. Children tend to be civil.

O jornal Folha de S. Paul began calling Hamas a terrorist group because “According to Writing Manual, the word terrorist must be used to describe anyone who “practices indiscriminate violence against non-combatants in order to spread panic and intimidate opponents””.

I haven't read recent versions of Folha's Editorial Manual, but I fondly remember a historical advertisement that the newspaper ran and which ended with a beautiful phrase: “it is possible to tell a lot of lies by only telling the truth!”.

A Sheet He doesn't seem to want to even bother telling the truth. It reports what Hamas used as justification for the attack, but does not tell us that what the group said is true. The truth may not justify the actions, but it is still true. Report what Benjamin Netanyahu said, but only the part that interests Benjamin Netanyahu.

A Sheet can call Hamas a terrorist group to stay true to its Manual, but to remain faithful to the same Manual, would need to refer to Israel as a terrorist state and its rulers as terrorists, according to its own definition.

I will not discuss the technical concept of terrorism, which does not exist, but I will say something about the rhetorical use of the word.

First, however, I say that there are international treaties that establish international humanitarian law – what can and cannot be done in war –, which define the crime of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, among these the crime of apartheid.

If anyone takes the trouble to read, they will see that, technically, Israel violates every possible norm of humanitarian law and will see that the Israeli rulers and military are war criminals and guilty of crimes against humanity, including that of apartheid. I still do not say that they are guilty of the crime of genocide because I am not sure that the ethnic cleansing of a people, especially through expulsion from the territory, is exactly equivalent to the attempt to carry out the “destruction, total or partial, of a national group, ethnic, racial or religious”.

So, if the Sheet makes a point of covering, in the way it refers to Hamas, what it perceives as violations of humanitarian law or as war crimes or, even, crimes against humanity, I would use another terminology than that of terrorist.

But, to do good journalism, it would need to refer at least in the same way to Israel, its authorities and its military.

Good journalism? I don't want to teach the vicar Mass, but the Sheet You must know, you cannot not know, that when you refer to Hamas as a terrorist group, nothing more than you say or report matters or will make any difference! As soon as she says “terrorist group” she takes away any reason from the Palestinians and allows everything to Israel. All crimes are allowed against the terrorist! This is the rhetorical power of the word.

If this is not in your Writing Manual, I strongly recommend recycling it.

* Salem Nasser is a professor at the Faculty of Law of FGV-SP.

Originally published in the newspaper Folha de S. Paul.


the earth is round exists thanks to our readers and supporters.
Help us keep this idea going.
CONTRIBUTE

See this link for all articles

10 MOST READ IN THE LAST 7 DAYS

______________
  • What does dialectic of enlightenment mean?briefcase culture 19/09/2024 By GILLIAN ROSE: Considerations on the book by Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno
  • Armando Freitas (1940-2024)Armando de Freitas, son 27/09/2024 By MARCOS SISCAR: In honor of the poet who passed away yesterday, we are republishing the review of his book “Lar,”
  • Pablo Marçal in the mind of a young black manMind 04/10/2024 By SERGIO GODOY: Chronicle of an Uber ride
  • Coach — neofascist politics and traumaturgyThales-Ab 01/10/2024 By TALES AB´SÁBER: A people who desire the fascist brand new, the empty spirit of capitalism as a coup and as a crime, and their great leader, the public life of politics as a coach's dream
  • UERJ sinks in a river of crisesUERJ 29/09/2024 By RONALD VIZZONI GARCIA: The State University of Rio de Janeiro is a place of academic production and pride. However, it is in danger with leaders who show themselves to be small in the face of challenging situations.
  • Dead Seadog culture 29/09/2024 By SOLENI BISCOUTO FRESSATO: Commentary on Jorge Amado's book
  • Annie Ernaux and photographyannateresa fabris 2024 04/10/2024 By ANNATERESA FABRIS: Just like photographers attentive to the spectacle of everyday life, the writer demonstrates the ability to deal with aspects of mass civilization in a detached manner, but no less critical for that.
  • Hassan NasrallahOLD DOOR 01/10/2024 By TARIQ ALI: Nasrallah understood Israel better than most. His successor will have to learn fast
  • William BoulosValerio Arcary 02/10/2024 By VALERIO ARCARY: The election in São Paulo is the “mother” of all battles. Even if it loses in almost all capitals outside the Northeast, if the left wins in São Paulo it balances the outcome of the electoral balance.
  • Workers’ rights or identity struggles?Elenira Vilela 2024 30/09/2024 By ELENIRA VILELA: If yesterday we said “Socialism or barbarism”, today we say “Socialism or extinction” and this socialism contemplates in itself the end of all forms of oppression

SEARCH

TOPICS

NEW PUBLICATIONS