Modern furniture in Brazil

Elyeser Szturm, from the We series


Commentary on the book by Maria Cecília Loschiavo dos Santos

Studies on the integration of the modern in Brazil received a relevant contribution, and in a domain that, given its evidence, has been scarcely treated. The book by Maria Cecília Loschiavo dos Santos, by proposing a historiographical and iconographic systematization of modern furniture production in Brazil, not only fills a gap but also encourages reflection on aspects and modes of the modernization drive. By composing a panorama, situating problems and analyzing production, the book hints that, also in material culture, the imperatives of updating were imposed through the same bids and designs that commanded the arts.

Intending to identify the origins and development of Brazilian industrial design, especially in the furniture sector, Maria Cecília emphasizes the emergence of the figure of the designer in line with the transformations of the industrialization process and associated with architectural design. She does not intend to trace the social history of the furniture used extensively, as this would require social analysis, symbolic values ​​and cultural habits, in addition to aesthetic and expressive aspects.

Rather, it focuses on the designer's challenge: finding formal and technological solutions for the design and execution of furniture and other domestic utilities, required by architects' desire for general modernization and specific purposes. From artisanal production, often of unique objects with an artistic pretension, to industrial production, aimed at a consumer public in formation, the trajectory described seeks a possible specificity of Brazilian furniture, sometimes emphasizing the inventiveness of designers, sometimes the vicissitudes of product design in the face of the demands of fashion and marketing.

The story told by Maria Cecília is interesting; although made up of the typical features of forced modernization, it constituted icons and legendary inventors. From the Cama Patente to the Peg-leve line, from Warchavchik to Sérgio Rodrigues, from the Poltrona Mole to Gaivota, from John Graz to Tenreiro, from Geraldo de Barros to Fulvio Nanni, the commitment to assert a piece of furniture that wants to be modern and Brazilian is outlined. , beautiful and comfortable, sophisticated and, if possible, affordable. The path, well known as an example of modernization efforts in all areas, is marked by fluctuations in taste, the impetuosity of the projects, the rationality of the proposals, and, not least, the difficulties of implementation, given the improvised pace of developmentalism.

The typicality of the evolutionary line traced by Maria Cecília is evident in the way she sees the passage of furniture, from handcrafted object and work of art to product; or, from a minor genre to design, essential in architectural design. From the 20s until today, the evolution of furniture follows the changes that took place in literature, visual arts and architecture. The modernist experiences of Warchavichik, John Graz and Flávio de Carvalho; the projectualism inaugurated by architecture from the 30s onwards and the “project specification”, which responds to the demands of the art-technical binomial in the 50s/60s, are justified by the cultural projects and structural transformations of each historical situation. Finally, the history of modern furniture in Brazil is an effect of capitalist integration and the modernity it represents, even if hallucinated by the thematization of the “Brazilian reality”.

In the period 1950/60, rightly considered heroic, product design came of age, as the establishment of formal principles and technological development allowed mastery of materials and serial production and, simultaneously, a certain differentiation in the market. collaborated for the design vision to assimilate a captive audience. And this target audience was the same one that, culturally and politically, would be attuned to the turmoil in the arts and behavior. It is then understandable why this emphasis is not maintained when dealing with later production, that of the 1970s/90s.

A totalizing reading of the most recent production of furniture design is not possible, since, as in the related areas, it is dispersed, predominantly recoding and, frequently, nostalgic. The much sought-after articulation of form, function and production of modern projects was swallowed up by the vortex of fashion consumption.

The work seems to build the idea that, in the same way that the arts created a particular figure of the modern here, combining experimental freedom and cultural criticism, in its own way industrial design offered a production that was significant enough to change habits and styles in the field. domestic and functional furniture; and even more, that the vicissitudes of the projects exemplified the mishaps of modernization.

However, perhaps it is not enough to emphasize that the specificity of Brazilian furniture, sought in these projects, is primarily due to the “persistence of the presence of handcrafted wood work”, to the appreciation of some Brazilian materials, leather and wood, dominant in the period of affirmation. , and the reference of the objects, especially the armchairs, to equally Brazilian themes. This did not, however, prevent the excellence and originality of the work of modern furniture makers: projects such as Unilabor, Hobjeto and Mobília Contemporânea; of styles, like those of Joaquim Tenreiro and Sérgio Rodrigues; of solutions, such as the Poltrona Leve, the Poltrona mole, the Candango, for example. These do not translate a Brazilian piece of furniture, rather the surprising adventure of Brazilian inventiveness.

*Celso Favaretto is an art critic, retired professor at the Faculty of Education at USP and author, among other books, of Tropicália: allegory, joy (Studio).

Originally published on Journal of Reviews, No. 02, on 01/05/1995.


Maria Cecília Loschiavo dos Santos. Modern furniture in Brazil. São Paulo, Studio Nobel/Edusp, 198 pages.


See this link for all articles


  • Introduction to “Capital” by Karl Marxred triangular culture 02/06/2024 By ELEUTÉRIO FS PRADO: Commentary on the book by Michael Heinrich
  • About artificial ignoranceEugenio Bucci 15/06/2024 By EUGÊNIO BUCCI: Today, ignorance is not an uninhabited house, devoid of ideas, but a building full of disjointed nonsense, a goo of heavy density that occupies every space
  • Franz Kafka, libertarian spiritFranz Kafka, libertarian spirit 13/06/2024 By MICHAEL LÖWY: Notes on the occasion of the centenary of the death of the Czech writer
  • Impasses and solutions for the political momentjose dirceu 12/06/2024 By JOSÉ DIRCEU: The development program must be the basis of a political commitment from the democratic front
  • Union registrationSUBWAY 11/06/2024 By LAWRENCE ESTIVALET DE MELLO & RENATA QUEIROZ DUTRA: The Ministry of Labor has decided to grant union registration to Proifes. However, union registration is not the same as union representation
  • The strike at federal Universities and Institutescorridor glazing 01/06/2024 By ROBERTO LEHER: The government disconnects from its effective social base by removing those who fought against Jair Bolsonaro from the political table
  • Confessions of a Catholic LadyMarilia Pacheco Fiorillo 11/06/2024 By MARILIA PACHECO FIORILLO: Congenital reactionism is not only the preserve of evangelicals
  • The STF, Artificial Intelligence and the Labor Courtsouto-maior_edited 07/06/2024 By JORGE LUIZ SOUTO MAIOR: The implementation of the replacement of the human being by AI presupposes that it has already been trained to act in the way desired by the ruling class
  • A myopic logicRED MAN WALKING _ 12/06/2024 By LUIS FELIPE MIGUEL: The government does not have the political will to make education a priority, while it courts the military or highway police, who do not move a millimeter away from the Bolsonarism that they continue to support
  • Strengthen PROIFESclassroom 54mf 15/06/2024 By GIL VICENTE REIS DE FIGUEIREDO: The attempt to cancel PROIFES and, at the same time, turn a blind eye to the errors of ANDES management is a disservice to the construction of a new representation scenario