Iran's dilemma

Image: AA Dil
Whatsapp
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Telegram

By LUÍS FELIPE MIGUEL*

If it does not respond to the Israeli attack, Iran could find itself demoralized. If you go to war, you run the risk of a serious defeat.

In the face of the world's indifference, the genocide continues in Gaza.

It makes you want to ask: how many Palestinian children needed to be killed before the world was moved?

What will it take for a Palestinian life to finally be recognized as a human life?

Zionist leaders, members of Benjamin Netanyahu's government, praise soldiers who torture and rape Palestinian prisoners as heroes. Others openly advocate the extermination of the entire population of Gaza.

But none of this is enough for Israel to stop being recognized as the good partner of the liberal West, “the only democracy in the Middle East”.

An officially racist State, which deprives the majority of the population of any rights, imprisons children, tortures prisoners, uses the murder of opponents as a policy: what kind of democracy is that?

Now, Israel is trying to start a war in the region. (Yes, start: what is happening in Gaza, a powerful army against an unarmed population, is not a war, it is a massacre).

Two weeks ago, Israel bombed Yemen. Last Tuesday, it bombed Beirut. On Wednesday, it was Tehran's turn – the objective was to assassinate Ismail Haniyeh, leader of Hamas.

He was in the city for an official event, the inauguration of the new Iranian president. Israel detonated a bomb in an official government residence. All of this increases the severity of the aggression. The death of Ismail Haniyeh also makes a peace agreement in Gaza even more distant.

A war serves Benjamin Netanyahu's main objective: to remain in power.

And, with the war, Israel will try to position itself as a victim and repeat the old narrative of a poor state surrounded by hostile powers.

In fact, Israel is the aggressor power. Thanks to billion-dollar military aid from the United States, which is the great accomplice in the genocide of the Palestinian people, it has both offensive and defensive resources far superior to any other country in the region, including Iran.

If it does not respond to the Israeli attack, Iran could find itself demoralized. If you go to war, you run the risk of a serious defeat.

To contain Israel, it is necessary to build a broad rejection of the international community – which is difficult, given the weight of the Zionist lobby in United States politics. Still, we need to insist in this direction.

Brazil can take another step, going from verbal condemnation to breaking all commercial agreements and, finally, diplomatic relations with the genocidal State of Israel.

* Luis Felipe Miguel He is a professor at the Institute of Political Science at UnB. Author, among other books, of Democracy in the capitalist periphery: impasses in Brazil (authentic). [https://amzn.to/45NRwS2]

Originally posted on the author's social media.


the earth is round there is thanks to our readers and supporters.
Help us keep this idea going.
CONTRIBUTE

See all articles by

10 MOST READ IN THE LAST 7 DAYS

Forró in the construction of Brazil
By FERNANDA CANAVÊZ: Despite all prejudice, forró was recognized as a national cultural manifestation of Brazil, in a law sanctioned by President Lula in 2010
The Humanism of Edward Said
By HOMERO SANTIAGO: Said synthesizes a fruitful contradiction that was able to motivate the most notable, most combative and most current part of his work inside and outside the academy
Incel – body and virtual capitalism
By FÁTIMA VICENTE and TALES AB´SÁBER: Lecture by Fátima Vicente commented by Tales Ab´Sáber
Regime change in the West?
By PERRY ANDERSON: Where does neoliberalism stand in the midst of the current turmoil? In emergency conditions, it has been forced to take measures—interventionist, statist, and protectionist—that are anathema to its doctrine.
The new world of work and the organization of workers
By FRANCISCO ALANO: Workers are reaching their limit of tolerance. That is why it is not surprising that there has been a great response and engagement, especially among young workers, in the project and campaign to end the 6 x 1 work shift.
The neoliberal consensus
By GILBERTO MARINGONI: There is minimal chance that the Lula government will take on clearly left-wing banners in the remainder of his term, after almost 30 months of neoliberal economic options
Capitalism is more industrial than ever
By HENRIQUE AMORIM & GUILHERME HENRIQUE GUILHERME: The indication of an industrial platform capitalism, instead of being an attempt to introduce a new concept or notion, aims, in practice, to point out what is being reproduced, even if in a renewed form.
USP's neoliberal Marxism
By LUIZ CARLOS BRESSER-PEREIRA: Fábio Mascaro Querido has just made a notable contribution to the intellectual history of Brazil by publishing “Lugar peripheral, ideias moderna” (Peripheral Place, Modern Ideas), in which he studies what he calls “USP’s academic Marxism”
Gilmar Mendes and the “pejotização”
By JORGE LUIZ SOUTO MAIOR: Will the STF effectively determine the end of Labor Law and, consequently, of Labor Justice?
Ligia Maria Salgado Nobrega
By OLÍMPIO SALGADO NÓBREGA: Speech given on the occasion of the Honorary Diploma of the student of the Faculty of Education of USP, whose life was tragically cut short by the Brazilian Military Dictatorship
See all articles by

SEARCH

Search

TOPICS

NEW PUBLICATIONS