Labor won, but it is not a left-wing party

Image: Mizzu Cho


Labor leader Keir Starmer is not a moderate, not a centrist, but rather a right-wing, uncompromising, free-market politician

Labor's victory is no reason to celebrate. Well, it's good news that the right-wing Conservatives lost, but it's bad news that the right and the Labor Party won. A neoliberal party.

I think it's been clear for some time that they would win, but what's not clear to anyone who doesn't live in England is that today the Labor Party is not the party of workers, but of big business. It's the party of big business.

Their leader, Keir Starmer, is an opportunist. He gained party leadership by promising water, railways and public mail, but once obtained, he disregarded these promises: more than 200 members left after a few weeks, it was a kind of purge. Keir Starmer's task was to convince the right-wing media and with the BBC that the country was safe, that nothing would change: he got closer and closer to the conservatives, at the end of the elections there was almost no difference between them.

That the rich will stay rich. There will be no public ownership, no radical policies. The UK will continue to supply weapons. To Israel, for example. Keir Starmer is supposed to be a human rights lawyer, but he ignores the rights of Palestinians and proudly calls himself a Zionist. He is a right-wing man.

Hope remains on the left, but we need to organize ourselves. There is a path, the working class has the same strength as always, because it does everything: it produces services, transport, everything. But if you don't act to protect your interests, you fall into far-right propaganda, and that destroys hope.

 Because the far right will always support the status quo, large companies. That's where their money comes from, but right-wing politicians will say what the working class likes to hear. However, just look at their actions: they are in favor of more privatization, they would completely destroy the public health system.

Former Labor leader Jeremy Corbin was elected as an independent. I supported him and I also supported his candidacy publicly. See, there's an interesting thing: the Labor vote has increased slightly in proportional terms. This election was not a victory for Labor, but a rejection of the Conservatives: people voted for whoever could expel them. Labor won an abundant third, which gives them a large majority: it's the electoral system.

To win the elections today, it is not enough to be moderate, you have to be a liar. Keir Starmer is not a moderate, he is not a centrist, but rather a right-wing, uncompromising, free market-oriented politician. He just dresses differently. O Labour It is a business party and they reiterated this: they will not tax bankers' profits, they will not increase taxes on large companies. They will grow the economy at Britain's expense, profiting from the workforce, exploiting low wages and weak unions. Keir Starmer has nothing to do with unions, he ignores them.

I do not believe that Rishi Sunak, the outgoing Prime Minister, deserved all the personal hostility he was subjected to, as it was Boris Johnson and Liz Truss who destroyed the Tories.

Nigel Farage is a populist, a kind of Donald Trump. A right-wing man who claims to speak on behalf of the working class, who you would have a drink with. Obviously, it is a fraud. His goal is to divide workers, blame immigrants and, at the same time, cut taxes and end public services.

Le Pen and Bardella in France are there for business, they have the capital, but they wear a mask and they do it very well. But we hear little about how the left is uniting in France: it got more votes than Emmanuel Macron, but it's only about him. They call Macron centrist, I would call him right-wing, like Starmer in Great Britain. Unlike the left, the extreme right will not change the balance of power and, although unpleasant, in the end the right is preferred to the left, as the right would take away their power and wealth: this is what caused fascism and Nazism.

Donald Trump is the ultimate disaster, a global tragedy. But the Democrats are once again very right-wing. Joe Biden clearly can't handle things, it's just a gross example of personal vanity - the Democrats should have said this from the beginning, but the financial and political mechanisms are so corrupt that they can't remove someone who is clearly incompetent.

*Ken Loach is a British filmmaker. He directed, among other films, You were not here.

Text established from an interview with Federico Pontiggia.

Translation: Anselmo Pessoa Neto.

Originally published on the portal Daily fact.

the earth is round there is thanks to our readers and supporters.
Help us keep this idea going.

See this link for all articles


  • A study of the Ailton Krenak case1974__Identity ignored 21/07/2024 By MARIA SILVIA CINTRA MARTINS: I prefer to dream of kinship with nature and stones with Krenak than embark on the naturalization of genocide
  • Clarice Lispector at the cinemaculture passion according to gh 22/07/2024 By LUCIANA MOLINA: Commentary on three film adaptations of Clarice Lispector's work
  • What time is it on the NATO war clock?Jose Luis Fiori 17/07/2024 By JOSÉ LUÍS FIORI: The hands of the “world war clock” are moving faster and faster
  • Digital blackoutSergio Amadeu da Silveira 22/07/2024 By SÉRGIO AMADEU DA SILVEIRA: The algorithmic catastrophe and the “blackout” cloud
  • The Taiwan dispute and technological innovation in ChinaChina Flag 20/07/2024 By JOSÉ LUÍS FIORI: China is now the world leader in 37 of the 44 technologies considered most important for the economic and military development of the future
  • Ailton Krenak's essay productionculture drops transp 11/07/2024 By FILIPE DE FREITAS GONÇALVES: By radicalizing his critique of capitalism, Krenak forgets that what is leading the world to its end is the economic and social system in which we live and not our separation from nature
  • The radicality of aesthetic lifeculture 04 20/07/2024 By AMANDA DE ALMEIDA ROMÃO: The meaning of life for Contardo Calligaris
  • 40 years without Michel FoucaultVenice 13/07/2024 By VINÍCIUS DUTRA: What still remains admirable in Foucault's way of reflecting is his acumen in contesting ideas intuitively accepted by the critical tradition of thought
  • The agrarian issue in Brazil — according to Octávio IanniJose-Raimundo-Trindade2 19/07/2024 By JOSÉ RAIMUNDO TRINDADE: Ianni's contributions can help to reformulate the Brazilian agrarian debate, and the author's works point us to the axes for rethinking the Brazilian land structure
  • After neoliberalismELEUTERIO2 18/07/2024 By ELEUTÉRIO FS PRADO: The inability to think of capitalism as a social system formed by structuring social relations