Customs guideline?

Whatsapp
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Telegram

The term “customs” sounds like something individual, secondary, relative. It is understandable that the media and reactionaries manipulate the term, but it is not acceptable for progressive people to use the expression

By Julian Rodrigues*

“For a world where we are socially equal, humanly different and totally free”. (Rose Luxemburg)

When informing, in February, that the STF would decide on the “criminalization of homophobia”, the Estadão reported that it was a subject with the potential to operate a collision between the Judiciary and the National Congress – as it would be the first topic on a list of the “customs agenda”.

The former president of the Central Bank during the FHC government, Arminio Fraga, praised, in October, at the Value, the economic agenda of the Bolsonaro government, but harshly criticized its “customs agenda”.

In September, Rodrigo Maia (DEM-RJ), president of the Chamber, in an interview with Sheet, highlighted: “the Bolsonaro government’s agenda will not get off the ground”.

The PSDB's National Congress approved a manifesto in early December, which states: "we consider that the government – ​​any government – ​​should not interfere with customs".

The president of Novo, in October, said in an interview to the magazine Examination, that the “customs agenda” is defined by the citizen, not imposed by the Party.

Bernardo Ricupero, in an instigating article published on the website the earth is round (https://aterraeredonda.com.br/notas-sobre-o-bonapartismo-o-fascismo-e-o-bolsonarismo/), says that the center-right: “has developed a schizophrenic relationship with the government [Bolsonaro]: it defends the economic program, but shows reticence with the customs agenda”.

Commander Zé Dirceu, who returns to regular columnism, published in his most recent column: “sectors of the so-called Centrão and the liberal opposition are openly opposed to the president’s mores agenda”.

Mores?

I can't exactly identify the origin of the expression. Nor at what time were the themes of gender equality, racial equality, sexual and reproductive rights, human rights, affirmative policies, recognition of diversity compressed and reduced to the “customs agenda”.

In the dictionary, custom is equivalent to habit (like: waking up early). For the law, it seems that it can be defined as a “frequent practice”, it is confused with the concept of tradition.

The problem is that, who knows exactly why, a good part of the conservative press (which contaminated people on the left), manipulates the concept of agenda or agenda of “customs”.

An immediate advantage of using this expression is not having to explain exactly what you are talking about. Fashion? Culture? Gastronomy? Music? Language? Another facility is that they do not need to position themselves either for or against. After all, “customs” sounds like something very individual, secondary, relative.

It is understandable that the media and reactionaries alike misjudge the term. What you cannot understand, much less accept, are progressive people: intellectuals, activists, artists, academics, militants, to use the expression.

rights agenda

It's not that hard work. Not that difficult to understand. Instead of talking about “customs agenda”, just say: “rights agenda”.

Although it is not explicit, when someone uses the term “customs agenda”, what is actually being said is gender equality, racial equality, LGBTI rights, civil rights, sexual and reproductive rights, recognition of diversity, of human rights, after all.

In other words: there is nothing “custom”, behavioral or cultural details. It's about RIGHTS. From the struggle to end discrimination and oppression. Full recognition of rights and equality. We are talking about the feminist and anti-racist struggle. And the journey for sexual and reproductive rights. For the recognition of minorities and all human diversity.

Every time someone uses the term “customs agenda” the intention is to “pass a cloth”, to underestimate the struggle of women, black men and women, LGBTI, young people, peripherals, dissidents. No one is concerned with individual habits. What we want is recognition of rights. Build a world without oppression of any kind.

So let's agree: no one on the left will use the term "customs" when talking about feminist, anti-racist, LGBTI, etc. agendas.

*Julian Rodrigues he is a journalist and professor; activist of the LGBTI and Human Rights movements.

See this link for all articles

10 MOST READ IN THE LAST 7 DAYS

______________
  • About artificial ignoranceEugenio Bucci 15/06/2024 By EUGÊNIO BUCCI: Today, ignorance is not an uninhabited house, devoid of ideas, but a building full of disjointed nonsense, a goo of heavy density that occupies every space
  • Franz Kafka, libertarian spiritFranz Kafka, libertarian spirit 13/06/2024 By MICHAEL LÖWY: Notes on the occasion of the centenary of the death of the Czech writer
  • Introduction to “Capital” by Karl Marxred triangular culture 02/06/2024 By ELEUTÉRIO FS PRADO: Commentary on the book by Michael Heinrich
  • The society of dead historyclassroom similar to the one in usp history 16/06/2024 By ANTONIO SIMPLICIO DE ALMEIDA NETO: The subject of history was inserted into a generic area called Applied Human and Social Sciences and, finally, disappeared into the curricular drain
  • Impasses and solutions for the political momentjose dirceu 12/06/2024 By JOSÉ DIRCEU: The development program must be the basis of a political commitment from the democratic front
  • Strengthen PROIFESclassroom 54mf 15/06/2024 By GIL VICENTE REIS DE FIGUEIREDO: The attempt to cancel PROIFES and, at the same time, turn a blind eye to the errors of ANDES management is a disservice to the construction of a new representation scenario
  • The strike at federal Universities and Institutescorridor glazing 01/06/2024 By ROBERTO LEHER: The government disconnects from its effective social base by removing those who fought against Jair Bolsonaro from the political table
  • A myopic logicRED MAN WALKING _ 12/06/2024 By LUIS FELIPE MIGUEL: The government does not have the political will to make education a priority, while it courts the military or highway police, who do not move a millimeter away from the Bolsonarism that they continue to support
  • Hélio Pellegrino, 100 years oldHelio Pellegrino 14/06/2024 By FERNANDA CANAVÊZ & FERNANDA PACHECO-FERREIRA: In the vast elaboration of the psychoanalyst and writer, there is still an aspect little explored: the class struggle in psychoanalysis
  • Volodymyr Zelensky's trapstar wars 15/06/2024 By HUGO DIONÍSIO: Whether Zelensky gets his glass full – the US entry into the war – or his glass half full – Europe’s entry into the war – either solution is devastating for our lives

AUTHORS

TOPICS

NEW PUBLICATIONS