Why Calling Fascism Matters

Whatsapp
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Telegram
image_pdfimage_print

By SCOTT GILBERT*

More pundits are now debating whether Trump is a fascist, whether what we're watching right now is fascism, whether it is, in fact, time to use the F-word.

I only learned that my mother and Anne Frank were childhood friends when I brought home the Diary of Anne Frank in seventh grade. That day, my mom showed me a childhood photo of her with her, her cousin Ellen, and Anne and Margot Frank.

It was a rare glimpse into my mother's past. She never talked about growing up in Germany and the occupied Netherlands, about the war, about living in hiding, about the Holocaust. She refused to speak German even with us, her two children.

I later found out that, in 1960, my mother became the first person of her generation to sue the German government for reparations. Her lawyer was Robert Kempner, who survived a Nazi camp and became assistant chief US counsel during the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg. The trial dragged on for fourteen years before the case was dismissed for lack of legal funds. Only after her death was I able to read the transcripts describing her physical and psychological scars and I began to understand why she never left the house, even when I won prizes in high school.

Some argued that the German people did not know or understand what was going on around them. This may well be true, even though the signs were there from the beginning. There was, essentially, a refusal to see what was happening in front of them, and a failure of moral leadership at key moments when the regime could have been stopped. Different political factions—communists, socialists, the Jewish Union, the labor movement—failed to work together to end the Nazi program of "Make Germany Whole Again" however much they all, to some extent, recognized the danger. They didn't realize that there would come a time when the door would be violently slammed shut against any chance of stopping him.

Today we are witnessing the same spiral of events under Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” program — a program of hate and bigotry, tearing apart the norms of the rule of law as children like Darlyn Cristabel Cordova-Valle die in concentration camps across the border or while protesters are murdered in the streets of Kenosha, WI by the self-proclaimed white nationalist militia. All of this has advanced significantly in recent months: Trump denying the science of the pandemic as 181.000 people died; unmarked federal paramilitary groups chasing protesters in unmarked vans, and similar forces spreading to other cities; maneuvers to sabotage or cancel the core of democracy: elections.

More pundits are now debating whether Trump is a fascist, whether what we are seeing right now is fascism, whether it is, in fact, time to use the F-word. performing fascism, using fascist tactics, acting like a dictator, or waving to his base, yet they still refuse to openly say that Trump is a fascist or to call the regime he set up fascist. Some say this isn't fascism because we still have a two-party state; because the Gestapo is not knocking on everyone's door; because there is still some semblance of liberty; why Trump has not started a new war despite his bellicose threats.

If that is the criterion for labeling a regime fascist, then the Nazis weren't fascists when they came to power either. But they were. You can't judge whether a regime is fascist by its setbacks or what it hasn't done yet. You look at what Trump has done. You look at what he said and promise to do. You look at the goals of your regime and the direction it is taking us.

Right before her death, my mother was interviewed by Steven Spielberg's Shoah Foundation. She described the advance—a change of law and an ordinance here and there; suddenly she couldn't go to his favorite bakery anymore. Afterwards, she watched as her school principal was shot for refusing to raise the Nazi flag. Then, the day came when she could no longer see her friend Anne Frank.

I think of my mother and Anne Frank at the dinner table with our family, celebrating their grandchildren's success if the German people had kicked out the Nazis before it was too late.

Why is it so important to say it's fascism? Because if we as a people openly acknowledge the awful truth, then we can begin to act to stop this fascist regime from taking power before it's too late. If the German people had known what we know, and had had the chance to remove Hitler and the Nazi party with firm, non-violent protest, shouldn't they have taken it? Shouldn't they have refused to accept what was already happening?

That is the question we are now confronted with. If we are not capable of assuming the truth, this is not a debate but a call to mass delirium. How many Anne Franks or Darlyn Cristabel Cordova-Valles or Joseph Rosenbaums will we be allowing, how many lives will we be sacrificing, if we don't break with the illusion immediately?

*Scott Gilbert is a physician and activist for RefuseFascism.org.

Translation: Daniel Pavan

Originally published on the portal counterpunch.

 

See all articles by

10 MOST READ IN THE LAST 7 DAYS

Regis Bonvicino (1955-2025)
By TALES AB'SÁBER: Tribute to the recently deceased poet
The Veils of Maya
By OTÁVIO A. FILHO: Between Plato and fake news, the truth hides beneath veils woven over centuries. Maya—a Hindu word that speaks of illusions—teaches us: illusion is part of the game, and distrust is the first step to seeing beyond the shadows we call reality.
The financial fragility of the US
By THOMAS PIKETTY: Just as the gold standard and colonialism collapsed under the weight of their own contradictions, dollar exceptionalism will also come to an end. The question is not if, but how: through a coordinated transition or a crisis that will leave even deeper scars on the global economy?
Claude Monet's studio
By AFRÂNIO CATANI: Commentary on the book by Jean-Philippe Toussaint
Phonic salience
By RAQUEL MEISTER KO FREITAG: The project 'Basic Skills of Portuguese' was the first linguistic research in Brazil to use computers to process linguistic data.
From Burroso to Barroso
By JORGE LUIZ SOUTO MAIOR: If the Burroso of the 80s was a comic character, the Barroso of the 20s is a legal tragedy. His nonsense is no longer on the radio, but in the courts – and this time, the joke ends not with laughter, but with rights torn apart and workers left unprotected. The farce has become doctrine.
Harvard University and water fluoridation
By PAULO CAPEL NARVAI: Neither Harvard University, nor the University of Queensland, nor any “top medical journal” endorse the flat-earther health adventures implemented, under Donald Trump’s command, by the US government.
Petra Costa's cinema
By TALES AB´SÁBER: Petra Costa transforms Brasília into a broken mirror of Brazil: she reflects both the modernist dream of democracy and the cracks of evangelical authoritarianism. Her films are an act of resistance, not only against the destruction of the left's political project, but against the erasure of the very idea of a just country.
Russia and its geopolitical shift
By CARLOS EDUARDO MARTINS: The Primakov Doctrine discarded the idea of ​​superpowers and stated that the development and integration of the world economy made the international system a complex space that could only be managed in a multipolar way, implying the reconstruction of international and regional organizations.
See all articles by

SEARCH

Search

TOPICS

NEW PUBLICATIONS